Micro-Epsilon Laser Triangulation Principle
Transmitting, receiving imaging and distance measurement after calibration
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Facing the laser pointer at the end of the robot, taking the light point position on the target surface as the observation route, the two-dimensional point distribution is intended to be output. The page is for project evaluation and does not mean that the development has been completed or has been accepted on site.
Fix the camera and target surface, record the exposure and gain, and cover the light spot and background in the field of view. Fixed target, robot pose log and synchronized camera
Fix the camera and target surface, record exposure and gain, and cover the light spot and background in the field of view
Existing algorithmic evidence:A101–A112 only complete analytical synthesis spot and controlled geometry verification; see laser_spot_benchmark.json
Existing light point positioning, quality diagnosis or statistical modules can be used as the main calculation basis; ROI, calibration, threshold and interface verification still need to be completed by device.
Gaps in this scenario:ROI, ruler/plane calibration and reference point definition are required; only the two-dimensional position of the target surface can be directly observed. It only reflects the repeatability of the target intersection point. Two-dimensional target surface observation and complete three-dimensional robot calibration are defined separately.
Route-level gaps:Requires ROI, ruler/plane calibration and reference point definition; can only directly observe the two-dimensional position of the target surface
"Reusable modules" only describe the relative development volume and do not constitute a commitment to accuracy, tempo, stability or delivery time.
Test independently with a two-dimensional displacement stage and a fixed reference point, reporting center error P95, missed detections and false detections. Independent spatial reference and repeated trajectories, layered testing by attitude
| Acceptance items | Evidence required for project confirmation | Current status |
|---|---|---|
| Inputs and samples | Real device original frames, normal/abnormal samples, exposure and light path conditions, sample grouping and set aside | Not provided, waiting for project input |
| Magnitude and Error | Independent reference value, calibration record, error statistical caliber and mutual confirmation threshold | Not verified |
| Exceptions and boundaries | Anticipated handling of missed detections, false detections, overexposure, occlusion, reflection, out-of-view and communication abnormalities | To be defined |
| System integration | Interface, time synchronization, deployment platform, tempo, log, version and continuous running record | Not integrated |
The source supports measurement principles or similar applications; the module combination, device and acceptance method in this scenario are engineering derivation, and product verification has not been completed.
Transmitting, receiving imaging and distance measurement after calibration
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →The principle of using known projection patterns and geometric deformations for measurement
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Active point triangulation, scanned geometry and error propagation
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Target observation with terminal repeats in place
Please describe the task object, original picture or video, target indicators, device platform, interface and sample situation.
Phone: 13910119357