Micro-Epsilon Laser Triangulation Principle
Transmitting, receiving imaging and distance measurement after calibration
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Facing the connector pins, the point scanning three-dimensional topography is used as the observation route, and a pin height list is planned to be output. The page is for project evaluation and does not mean that the development has been completed or has been accepted on site.
Scanning mechanism with encoder, point laser transceiver geometry and synchronized images. Fixed baseline point laser receiving head and calibration Z platform
Scanning mechanism with encoder, point laser transceiver geometry and synchronized images
Existing algorithmic evidence:A101–A112 only complete analytical synthesis spot and controlled geometry verification; see laser_spot_benchmark.json
Light point extraction can only be used as an observation front-end, and core capabilities such as three-dimensional reconstruction, closed-loop control, wavefront or physical quantity inversion need to be developed and verified separately.
Gaps in this scenario:It is necessary to add new point triangulation intersection, scanning coordinate fusion, surface reconstruction and shape and position evaluation; A41 only fits existing three-dimensional points. Requires fine pitch scanning and pin assignment. The surface reflection of the actual machine and the small measuring range determine whether the effective point can be collected.
Route-level gaps:It is necessary to add new point triangulation intersection, scanning coordinate fusion, surface reconstruction and shape and position evaluation; A41 only fits existing three-dimensional points.
"New cores required" only describes the relative development volume and does not constitute a commitment to accuracy, tempo, stability or delivery time.
Use a known step/contour sample to perform a blind test with a CMM or profiler to verify the missing area and scanning step distance. Gauge block, microscopic height gauge and independent assembly sample comparison
| Acceptance items | Evidence required for project confirmation | Current status |
|---|---|---|
| Inputs and samples | Real device original frames, normal/abnormal samples, exposure and light path conditions, sample grouping and set aside | Not provided, waiting for project input |
| Magnitude and Error | Independent reference value, calibration record, error statistical caliber and mutual confirmation threshold | Not verified |
| Exceptions and boundaries | Anticipated handling of missed detections, false detections, overexposure, occlusion, reflection, out-of-view and communication abnormalities | To be defined |
| System integration | Interface, time synchronization, deployment platform, tempo, log, version and continuous running record | Not integrated |
The source supports measurement principles or similar applications; the module combination, device and acceptance method in this scenario are engineering derivation, and product verification has not been completed.
Transmitting, receiving imaging and distance measurement after calibration
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Industrial height, distance and position measurement categories
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Active point triangulation, scanned geometry and error propagation
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Point-by-point height measurement of pin top surface
Please describe the task object, original picture or video, target indicators, device platform, interface and sample situation.
Phone: 13910119357