Micro-Epsilon Laser Triangulation Principle
Transmitting, receiving imaging and distance measurement after calibration
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →For grinding ceramic parts, the point scanning three-dimensional topography is used as the observation route, and the step height difference profile is intended to be output. The page is for project evaluation and does not mean that the development has been completed or has been accepted on site.
Scanning mechanism with encoder, point laser transceiver geometry and synchronized images. Reflection/transmission switchable test piece tooling and code scanning
Scanning mechanism with encoder, point laser transceiver geometry and synchronized images
Existing algorithmic evidence:A101–A112 only complete analytical synthesis spot and controlled geometry verification; see laser_spot_benchmark.json
Light point extraction can only be used as an observation front-end, and core capabilities such as three-dimensional reconstruction, closed-loop control, wavefront or physical quantity inversion need to be developed and verified separately.
Gaps in this scenario:It is necessary to add new point triangulation intersection, scanning coordinate fusion, surface reconstruction and shape and position evaluation; A41 only fits existing three-dimensional points. Rough surface speckle and edge effects need to be tested. Transparent or mirror materials need to be specially used to receive and receive optics, and universal adaptation is not promised.
Route-level gaps:It is necessary to add new point triangulation intersection, scanning coordinate fusion, surface reconstruction and shape and position evaluation; A41 only fits existing three-dimensional points.
"New cores required" only describes the relative development volume and does not constitute a commitment to accuracy, tempo, stability or delivery time.
Use a known step/contour sample to perform a blind test with a CMM or profiler to verify the missing area and scanning step distance. Blind testing of standard steps, interference/contour gauges and material groups
| Acceptance items | Evidence required for project confirmation | Current status |
|---|---|---|
| Inputs and samples | Real device original frames, normal/abnormal samples, exposure and light path conditions, sample grouping and set aside | Not provided, waiting for project input |
| Magnitude and Error | Independent reference value, calibration record, error statistical caliber and mutual confirmation threshold | Not verified |
| Exceptions and boundaries | Anticipated handling of missed detections, false detections, overexposure, occlusion, reflection, out-of-view and communication abnormalities | To be defined |
| System integration | Interface, time synchronization, deployment platform, tempo, log, version and continuous running record | Not integrated |
The source supports measurement principles or similar applications; the module combination, device and acceptance method in this scenario are engineering derivation, and product verification has not been completed.
Transmitting, receiving imaging and distance measurement after calibration
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Active point triangulation, scanned geometry and error propagation
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Effect of speckle on position and distance uncertainty
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Local height scan of grinding step
Please describe the task object, original picture or video, target indicators, device platform, interface and sample situation.
Phone: 13910119357