Micro-Epsilon Laser Triangulation Principle
Transmitting, receiving imaging and distance measurement after calibration
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Facing the parallel glass window, taking the light point position on the target surface as the observation route, the change of the transmission center is expected to be output. The page is for project evaluation and does not mean that the development has been completed or has been accepted on site.
Fix the camera and target surface, record the exposure and gain, and cover the light spot and background in the field of view. Reflection/transmission switchable test piece tooling and code scanning
Fix the camera and target surface, record exposure and gain, and cover the light spot and background in the field of view
Existing algorithmic evidence:A101–A112 only complete analytical synthesis spot and controlled geometry verification; see laser_spot_benchmark.json
Existing light point positioning, quality diagnosis or statistical modules can be used as the main calculation basis; ROI, calibration, threshold and interface verification still need to be completed by device.
Gaps in this scenario:ROI, ruler/plane calibration and reference point definition are required; only the two-dimensional position of the target surface can be directly observed. The complete stress field is inverted without center changes. Transparent or mirror materials need to be specially used to receive and receive optics, and universal adaptation is not promised.
Route-level gaps:Requires ROI, ruler/plane calibration and reference point definition; can only directly observe the two-dimensional position of the target surface
"Reusable modules" only describe the relative development volume and do not constitute a commitment to accuracy, tempo, stability or delivery time.
Test independently with a two-dimensional displacement stage and a fixed reference point, reporting center error P95, missed detections and false detections. Blind testing of standard steps, interference/contour gauges and material groups
| Acceptance items | Evidence required for project confirmation | Current status |
|---|---|---|
| Inputs and samples | Real device original frames, normal/abnormal samples, exposure and light path conditions, sample grouping and set aside | Not provided, waiting for project input |
| Magnitude and Error | Independent reference value, calibration record, error statistical caliber and mutual confirmation threshold | Not verified |
| Exceptions and boundaries | Anticipated handling of missed detections, false detections, overexposure, occlusion, reflection, out-of-view and communication abnormalities | To be defined |
| System integration | Interface, time synchronization, deployment platform, tempo, log, version and continuous running record | Not integrated |
The source supports measurement principles or similar applications; the module combination, device and acceptance method in this scenario are engineering derivation, and product verification has not been completed.
Transmitting, receiving imaging and distance measurement after calibration
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Active point triangulation, scanned geometry and error propagation
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Effect of speckle on position and distance uncertainty
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Comparison of beam movement due to window clamping stress
Please describe the task object, original picture or video, target indicators, device platform, interface and sample situation.
Phone: 13910119357