Micro-Epsilon Laser Triangulation Principle
Transmitting, receiving imaging and distance measurement after calibration
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →For multi-core wire harness fixtures, the separation light point array comparison is used as the observation route, and the fixture lattice matching residual is intended to be output. The page is for project evaluation and does not mean that the development has been completed or has been accepted on site.
Separate and numberable multiple light spots, fixed receiving plane and field of view. Fine light spot, suitable numerical aperture, stable guide mechanism
Separate and numberable multiple light spots, fixed receiving plane and field of view
Existing algorithmic evidence:A101–A112 only complete analytical synthesis spot and controlled geometry verification; see laser_spot_benchmark.json
The light point detection front-end or timing statistics module can be reused, but the project still needs to add geometric calibration, time synchronization, motion compensation or equipment system integration.
Gaps in this scenario:Point sequence numbering, local ROI, crosstalk and occlusion processing are required; A108 only matches by distance in the same coordinate system. It only measures the tooling target and does not directly identify the core wire. Minimum target size is determined by actual spot and imaging resolution
Route-level gaps:Point sequence numbering, local ROI, crosstalk and occlusion processing are required; A108 only matches by distance in the same coordinate system
"Partially reusable" only describes the relative development volume and does not constitute a commitment to accuracy, tempo, stability or delivery time.
Verify point counts, match rates, and mismatches using known lattice and artificial defect/overlap/scrambling data. Microscopic measuring tool and standard wire/rod comparison, control speed and angle
| Acceptance items | Evidence required for project confirmation | Current status |
|---|---|---|
| Inputs and samples | Real device original frames, normal/abnormal samples, exposure and light path conditions, sample grouping and set aside | Not provided, waiting for project input |
| Magnitude and Error | Independent reference value, calibration record, error statistical caliber and mutual confirmation threshold | Not verified |
| Exceptions and boundaries | Anticipated handling of missed detections, false detections, overexposure, occlusion, reflection, out-of-view and communication abnormalities | To be defined |
| System integration | Interface, time synchronization, deployment platform, tempo, log, version and continuous running record | Not integrated |
The source supports measurement principles or similar applications; the module combination, device and acceptance method in this scenario are engineering derivation, and product verification has not been completed.
Transmitting, receiving imaging and distance measurement after calibration
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Displacement sensor combination thickness measurement; different measurement principles should be selected separately
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Effect of speckle on position and distance uncertainty
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Dot matrix return inspection of wire harness end tooling
Please describe the task object, original picture or video, target indicators, device platform, interface and sample situation.
Phone: 13910119357