Micro-Epsilon Laser Triangulation Principle
Transmitting, receiving imaging and distance measurement after calibration
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Facing the step axis, using point scanning three-dimensional topography as the observation route, the step height difference and boundary candidates are planned to be output. The page is for project evaluation and does not mean that the development has been completed or has been accepted on site.
Scanning mechanism with encoder, point laser transceiver geometry and synchronized images. Calibration point ranging head, positioning fixture and scanning/turntable encoder
Scanning mechanism with encoder, point laser transceiver geometry and synchronized images
Existing algorithmic evidence:A101–A112 only complete analytical synthesis spot and controlled geometry verification; see laser_spot_benchmark.json
Light point extraction can only be used as an observation front-end, and core capabilities such as three-dimensional reconstruction, closed-loop control, wavefront or physical quantity inversion need to be developed and verified separately.
Gaps in this scenario:It is necessary to add new point triangulation intersection, scanning coordinate fusion, surface reconstruction and shape and position evaluation; A41 only fits existing three-dimensional points. Edge mixed pixels need to be removed. It is necessary to complete the definition of datum and tolerance before judging OK/NG.
Route-level gaps:It is necessary to add new point triangulation intersection, scanning coordinate fusion, surface reconstruction and shape and position evaluation; A41 only fits existing three-dimensional points.
"New cores required" only describes the relative development volume and does not constitute a commitment to accuracy, tempo, stability or delivery time.
Use a known step/contour sample to perform a blind test with a CMM or profiler to verify the missing area and scanning step distance. Independent control of gauge block, profiler or three coordinates
| Acceptance items | Evidence required for project confirmation | Current status |
|---|---|---|
| Inputs and samples | Real device original frames, normal/abnormal samples, exposure and light path conditions, sample grouping and set aside | Not provided, waiting for project input |
| Magnitude and Error | Independent reference value, calibration record, error statistical caliber and mutual confirmation threshold | Not verified |
| Exceptions and boundaries | Anticipated handling of missed detections, false detections, overexposure, occlusion, reflection, out-of-view and communication abnormalities | To be defined |
| System integration | Interface, time synchronization, deployment platform, tempo, log, version and continuous running record | Not integrated |
The source supports measurement principles or similar applications; the module combination, device and acceptance method in this scenario are engineering derivation, and product verification has not been completed.
Transmitting, receiving imaging and distance measurement after calibration
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Hole target adapter aligned with reference axis
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Active point triangulation, scanned geometry and error propagation
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Height and axial difference sampling on both sides of the shaft shoulder
Please describe the task object, original picture or video, target indicators, device platform, interface and sample situation.
Phone: 13910119357