Service scope and implementation plan
direction numberD18
Demand scenario8 items
main inputLWIR L2/L3；LWIR/MWIR L2/L3；L5；SWIR L1/L5
Typical routeT03、T05、T04、T10、T12、T13
The project scope is determined based on samples, equipment, working conditions and written indicators; general modules, special models and multi-sensor integration are configured according to the evaluation results.
Application scenarios and development content
IR137Cooling Uniformity and Warpage Risk of Plastic Injection Molded Parts
- Minimum input and technical route
- LWIR L2/L3；T03+T05
- target output
- Surface temperatures, cooling curves and risk zones
- Implementation
- The true value of the finished product is required
- critical acceptance
- Comparison with warpage measurements, correlation, area Recall
IR138Rubber vulcanization temperature field and under-/over-sulfur candidates
- Minimum input and technical route
- LWIR/MWIR L2/L3；T05
- target output
- Temperature profile, uniformity and process status
- Implementation
- Material testing required
- critical acceptance
- Compare to hardness/cure curve, condition F1
IR139Thermal abnormalities after tire molding/vulcanization
- Minimum input and technical route
- LWIR L2/L3；T04+T05
- target output
- Tread/sidewall temperature difference and abnormal areas
- Implementation
- Need product true value
- critical acceptance
- Compare with X-ray/uniformity/teardown
IR140Thermal response screening for film thickness or coating unevenness
- Minimum input and technical route
- L5；T10
- target output
- Band anomalies and thickness proxies
- Implementation
- Calibration samples required
- critical acceptance
- Compared with online thickness measurement, RMSE, minimum band
IR141Difference in moisture content between paper and roll SWIR detection
- Minimum input and technical route
- SWIR L1/L5；T12
- target output
- Water-bearing agents and lateral distribution
- Implementation
- Spectrum/water content true value required
- critical acceptance
- Compare with drying method/moisture meter, RMSE
IR142Textile water, oil stain and material sorting
- Minimum input and technical route
- SWIR/Multispectral L1/L5;T12+T13
- target output
- Material/Contamination Category and Area
- Implementation
- Product spectrum data required
- critical acceptance
- Performance of each type of Recall and batch migration
IR143Heat seal film and composite bag sealing temperature integrity
- Minimum input and technical route
- LWIR L2/L3；T03+T04
- target output
- Sealing temperature, continuity and notch
- Implementation
- Partially reusable
- critical acceptance
- Compare to peel strength/leak test
IR144Active thermal delamination detection of tires, belts and rubber parts
- Minimum input and technical route
- L5；T10
- target output
- Delamination/bubble candidates and areas
- Implementation
- Need reference sample
- critical acceptance
- Versus ultrasound/disassembly, POD
Implementation and delivery methods
- Project input confirmationCheck camera, spectral band, bit depth, SDK, environmental conditions, sample and acceptance true value.
- Sample verificationVerify key processing links, applicable conditions and abnormal working conditions, and determine the development scope and acceptance methods.
- Algorithm development and integrationImplement data parsing, algorithms, quality gating, interfaces and target platform deployment.
- Test acceptance and handoverRetest according to the agreed test set and target platform, and hand over the deliverables, test results and applicable conditions.
- Requirements and technical solutions, input and output and interface field definitions
- Algorithm library, model or SDK/API; delivery form is confirmed in the project plan
- Sample program, parameter configuration, error status and calling instructions
- Test set version, indicator definition, stratification results and failed sample records
- Target platform adaptation, resource usage and running delay records
- Version, dependencies, license, reproduction steps and applicable conditions description
Acceptance design
Each scenario establishes independent test cases according to "key acceptance". When sharing models across scenarios, results are reported separately for each scenario, distance, load, environment, and target size, supplemented by overall statistics.
When high-risk alarms or controls are involved, the algorithm output is used for review or linkage judgment; safety functions, regulatory responsibilities, and automatic disposal require separate design and acceptance.
Frequently Asked Questions for Enterprise Customers
Can I purchase directly based on one of the scenes?
Can be evaluated first as a separate work package. The formal scope should describe the device, data, target objects, environment, interfaces, delivery form, and acceptance thresholds.
Can it be started when there are no abnormal samples?
The data interface, normal baseline, acquisition plan and simulation/controlled test design can be completed first; the abnormal detection rate and fault classification effect can be evaluated after obtaining sufficient abnormal true values.
Can the algorithm directly trigger alarms or equipment actions?
Duration, deduplication, quality gating, manual review, communication failure and safety interlocking need to be designed based on business risks. High-risk actions should be activated after completion of independent safety mechanisms and on-site acceptance.