Candidate processing workflow
Robust registration → ICP/GICP refinement → closest-point/normal distances → regions and grading
JIVISION offers project development and technical assessment for Point-Cloud Change, Assembly Deviation and Deformation Comparison. Scope: Geometric differences against CAD, prior conditions or other batches.
Geometric differences against CAD, prior conditions or other batches
Do not use deforming regions as registration datums, which can absorb actual change; identify traceable stable regions.
These are candidate implementation paths. Establish a baseline on real samples, then select or combine methods for imaging, speed and deployment constraints. Model names do not imply measured project results.
Robust registration → ICP/GICP refinement → closest-point/normal distances → regions and grading
Provide drawings/datums, range and tolerances, traceable references, surface materials, working distance, camera arrangement, calibration conditions and cycle time.
Deviation software, difference maps, out-of-tolerance regions and reports
Specify input formats, output fields, coordinates/units, error states, versions and invocation methods. Define review and failure handling. The statement of work determines the exact scope of source code, executables, model files or analysis reports.
Registration error; deviation error; minimum changed region; repeatability
Distinguish resolution, absolute error and repeatability. Compare independent references across the working range, record calibration residuals and environmental/pose changes, and assess the measurement system where required.
These are measures to agree and test, not achieved-performance claims. Freeze samples, reference truth, thresholds and hardware/software versions before acceptance; report subgroup results and failures, identifying under-sampled conditions as uncovered.
Agree targets, stations, inputs and responsibilities in a statement of work, separating required and excluded conditions.
Use representative samples to test critical risks, document feasibility/failures and scope the next-stage estimate.
Implement agreed functions and interfaces with configuration/change records; use offline replay before authorized device or site integration.
Retest against individual measures and hand over contracted artifacts with known limits; manage maintenance, expansion and changeovers as subsequent work packages.
Pixel resolution is not measurement accuracy. Include occlusion, reflections, vibration and thermal drift in the error budget; confirm statutory metrology obligations separately.
Candidate technologies are not license clearance. Check code, model weights, training data and dependency versions separately. Replace, license or exclude components unsuitable for the intended commercial delivery. Customer data is not used for public training by default.
Geometric differences against CAD, prior conditions or other batches. Deliverables: Deviation software, difference maps, out-of-tolerance regions and reports
Do not use deforming regions as registration datums, which can absorb actual change; identify traceable stable regions.
Task-specific measures: Registration error; deviation error; minimum changed region; repeatability. Distinguish resolution, absolute error and repeatability. Compare independent references across the working range, record calibration residuals and environmental/pose changes, and assess the measurement system where required.
After reviewing samples for geometric differences against cad, prior conditions or other batches, equipment conditions and interfaces, scope validation, development, deployment and acceptance separately. Data coverage, site changes and delivery rights affect the estimate; no fixed performance or schedule is promised before assessment.
Service ID: B15 · Point-Cloud Change, Assembly Deviation and Deformation Comparison
Describe available samples, equipment and target measures. Agree confidentiality and permissions before transferring sensitive or personal data through an approved channel.
+86 13910119357