Micro-Epsilon Laser Triangulation Principle
Transmitting, receiving imaging and distance measurement after calibration
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →For the flexible beam specimen of the livestock scale, the optical lever mechanical inversion is used as the observation route, and the beam deflection and weight reference are planned to be output. The page is for project evaluation and does not mean that the development has been completed or has been accepted on site.
The reflector/flexible beam is fixed to the stressed structure and the temperature and load references are recorded. Controlled sampling station, spot laser depth test stand and encoded motion
The reflector/flexible beam is fixed to the stressed structure, and the temperature and load reference are recorded
Existing algorithmic evidence:A101–A112 only complete analytical synthesis spot and controlled geometry verification; see laser_spot_benchmark.json
Light point extraction can only be used as an observation front-end, and core capabilities such as three-dimensional reconstruction, closed-loop control, wavefront or physical quantity inversion need to be developed and verified separately.
Gaps in this scenario:New structural stiffness, boundary conditions, force/strain model and cross-axis compensation need to be added; displacement is not directly equal to force. Animal dynamics and unbalanced loads must be verified separately. Plants/soft targets require low-disturbance sampling, and growth/quality inference requires building another model.
Route-level gaps:New structural stiffness, boundary conditions, force/strain model and cross-axis compensation need to be added; displacement is not directly equal to force
"New cores required" only describes the relative development volume and does not constitute a commitment to accuracy, tempo, stability or delivery time.
Use standard weights, force sensors or strain gauges to conduct cyclic loading blind tests to verify hysteresis and creep. Standard height parts, manual measurement and blind testing of different surface materials
| Acceptance items | Evidence required for project confirmation | Current status |
|---|---|---|
| Inputs and samples | Real device original frames, normal/abnormal samples, exposure and light path conditions, sample grouping and set aside | Not provided, waiting for project input |
| Magnitude and Error | Independent reference value, calibration record, error statistical caliber and mutual confirmation threshold | Not verified |
| Exceptions and boundaries | Anticipated handling of missed detections, false detections, overexposure, occlusion, reflection, out-of-view and communication abnormalities | To be defined |
| System integration | Interface, time synchronization, deployment platform, tempo, log, version and continuous running record | Not integrated |
The source supports measurement principles or similar applications; the module combination, device and acceptance method in this scenario are engineering derivation, and product verification has not been completed.
Transmitting, receiving imaging and distance measurement after calibration
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Active point triangulation, scanned geometry and error propagation
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Effect of speckle on position and distance uncertainty
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Research on load calibration of reflection points of scale beams
Please describe the task object, original picture or video, target indicators, device platform, interface and sample situation.
Phone: 13910119357