MathWorks Shack-Hartmann Modeling
Subaperture spot migration, wavefront slope and wavefront reconstruction steps
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →LSP237 · Wavefront and adaptive optics · Wavefront and adaptive optics
Need to add new core
Comparison of aberrations before and after lens adjustment
Facing the lens wavefront tooling, using the sub-aperture light spot and wavefront as the observation route, it is intended to output wavefront difference candidates and effective apertures. The page is for project evaluation and does not mean that the development has been completed or has been accepted on site.
Project Judgment Summary
Product/DeviceLens Wavefront Tooling
Measure routeWAVE·Sub-aperture spot and wavefront
Ability GradingNeed to add new core
Verification statusThe actual machine/product domain acceptance of this scenario has not been carried out
Scene nature:Similar potential application scenarios for laser spots. The potential application scenario has not yet been developed into a complete product system; the actual machine/product domain acceptance of this scenario has not been carried out. The actual product/product domain acceptance quantity in catalog statistics is 0.
Business tasks and intended output
- target audience
- Lens Wavefront Tooling: Subaperture Spots and Wavefronts
- pseudo output
- Wavefront difference candidates and effective aperture
- Applicable conditions
- Transmission/reflection configurations need to be calibrated separately
- priority
- Special development. The measurement/control core needs to be supplemented and verified according to the special project approval
Imaging input and algorithm routing
Imaging and device conditions
Microlens array, reference plane wave, corresponding sub-aperture number and focal length calibration. Microlens array, reference spot field and wavefront calibration components
WAVE·Sub-aperture spot and wavefront
Microlens array, reference plane wave, corresponding sub-aperture number and focal length calibration
- A102Multi-laser spot connected domain candidate extraction
- A103Logarithmic quadratic surface sub-pixel spot center
- A104Gradient radial symmetry light spot center
- A107Laser spot quality and usability diagnostics
- A108One-to-one matching of multi-laser spot reference bits
Existing algorithmic evidence:A101–A112 only complete analytical synthesis spot and controlled geometry verification; see laser_spot_benchmark.json
Current capabilities and capabilities to be supplemented
Need to add new core
Need to add core computing
Light point extraction can only be used as an observation front-end, and core capabilities such as three-dimensional reconstruction, closed-loop control, wavefront or physical quantity inversion need to be developed and verified separately.
Gaps in this scenario:Slope conversion, wavefront integration/Zernike fitting and defect reconstruction need to be added; the centroid itself does not output the wavefront. Transmission/reflection configurations need to be calibrated separately. The existing code provides center extraction, and the wavefront slope and reconstruction core need to be added.
Route-level gaps:Need to add slope conversion, wavefront integration/Zernike fitting and defect reconstruction; the centroid itself does not output the wavefront
"New cores required" only describes the relative development volume and does not constitute a commitment to accuracy, tempo, stability or delivery time.
Verification methods and acceptance prerequisites
Use an independent interferometer or known aberration phase element to verify slope, reconstruction residuals, and dynamic range. Comparison with known aberration elements and interferometers
| Acceptance items | Evidence required for project confirmation | Current status |
|---|---|---|
| Inputs and samples | Real device original frames, normal/abnormal samples, exposure and light path conditions, sample grouping and set aside | Not provided, waiting for project input |
| Magnitude and Error | Independent reference value, calibration record, error statistical caliber and mutual confirmation threshold | Not verified |
| Exceptions and boundaries | Anticipated handling of missed detections, false detections, overexposure, occlusion, reflection, out-of-view and communication abnormalities | To be defined |
| System integration | Interface, time synchronization, deployment platform, tempo, log, version and continuous running record | Not integrated |
Evidence sources and citation boundaries
The source supports measurement principles or similar applications; the module combination, device and acceptance method in this scenario are engineering derivation, and product verification has not been completed.
Large dynamic range Shack-Hartmann study
Light point correlation, missing points, and wavefront reconstruction constraints
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Source usage scope:The public information is used to support the measurement principle or the existence of similar applications, and does not prove that this scenario has been developed, deployed or accepted by Jishi Technology.
Project consultation
xuzhiyang0928@gmail.com
Define the Development Scope with Samples and Device Requirements
Comparison of aberrations before and after lens adjustment
Please describe the task object, original picture or video, target indicators, device platform, interface and sample situation.
Phone: 13910119357xuzhiyang0928@gmail.com