Hamar hole system alignment instructions
Hole target adapter aligned with reference axis
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Facing the tank bottom plate specimen, the point scanning three-dimensional topography is used as the observation route, and the height difference before and after loading is intended to be output. The page is for project evaluation and does not mean that the development has been completed or has been accepted on site.
Scanning mechanism with encoder, point laser transceiver geometry and synchronized images. In-tube/outside receiving targets, stable reference stations and installation measurement records
Scanning mechanism with encoder, point laser transceiver geometry and synchronized images
Existing algorithmic evidence:A101–A112 only complete analytical synthesis spot and controlled geometry verification; see laser_spot_benchmark.json
Light point extraction can only be used as an observation front-end, and core capabilities such as three-dimensional reconstruction, closed-loop control, wavefront or physical quantity inversion need to be developed and verified separately.
Gaps in this scenario:It is necessary to add new point triangulation intersection, scanning coordinate fusion, surface reconstruction and shape and position evaluation; A41 only fits existing three-dimensional points. The settlement datum cannot be located on the same deformed base plate. Only visible target surface geometry is measured, wall thickness, corrosion or pressure bearing capacity is not inferred.
Route-level gaps:It is necessary to add new point triangulation intersection, scanning coordinate fusion, surface reconstruction and shape and position evaluation; A41 only fits existing three-dimensional points.
"New cores required" only describes the relative development volume and does not constitute a commitment to accuracy, tempo, stability or delivery time.
Use a known step/contour sample to perform a blind test with a CMM or profiler to verify the missing area and scanning step distance. Mechanical datum, total station or independent displacement meter comparison
| Acceptance items | Evidence required for project confirmation | Current status |
|---|---|---|
| Inputs and samples | Real device original frames, normal/abnormal samples, exposure and light path conditions, sample grouping and set aside | Not provided, waiting for project input |
| Magnitude and Error | Independent reference value, calibration record, error statistical caliber and mutual confirmation threshold | Not verified |
| Exceptions and boundaries | Anticipated handling of missed detections, false detections, overexposure, occlusion, reflection, out-of-view and communication abnormalities | To be defined |
| System integration | Interface, time synchronization, deployment platform, tempo, log, version and continuous running record | Not integrated |
The source supports measurement principles or similar applications; the module combination, device and acceptance method in this scenario are engineering derivation, and product verification has not been completed.
Hole target adapter aligned with reference axis
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Laser alignment categories for shafts, equipment and industrial installations
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Active point triangulation, scanned geometry and error propagation
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Multi-point sampling for floor settlement model
Please describe the task object, original picture or video, target indicators, device platform, interface and sample situation.
Phone: 13910119357