Micro-Epsilon Laser Triangulation Principle
Transmitting, receiving imaging and distance measurement after calibration
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Facing the mobile robot sensor frame, the angle of the reflective optical lever is used as the observation route, and the near and far field light point offset is intended to be output. The page is for project evaluation and does not mean that the development has been completed or has been accepted on site.
Fix the incident light and reflector, and calibrate the corresponding relationship between the camera/receiving screen and the angle stage. Use point projection and fixed target surfaces at controlled close work stations
Fix the incident light and reflector, and calibrate the corresponding relationship between the camera/receiving screen and the angle stage
Existing algorithmic evidence:A101–A112 only complete analytical synthesis spot and controlled geometry verification; see laser_spot_benchmark.json
The light point detection front-end or timing statistics module can be reused, but the project still needs to add geometric calibration, time synchronization, motion compensation or equipment system integration.
Gaps in this scenario:Optical lever geometry, reflection double angle relationship and incident point movement compensation are required; mirror angle and target translation must be separated. Not a substitute for complete perceptual calibration. It is only used for auxiliary measurement. For safe parking or obstacle avoidance, a separate system must be built.
Route-level gaps:Optical lever geometry, reflection double angle relationship and incident point movement compensation are required; mirror angle and target translation must be separated
"Partially reusable" only describes the relative development volume and does not constitute a commitment to accuracy, tempo, stability or delivery time.
Use an independent angle stage/autocollimator to conduct bidirectional and multi-attitude tests, and report the angle error and return difference. Cross-testing of displacement reference platform and simulated yaw/height changes
| Acceptance items | Evidence required for project confirmation | Current status |
|---|---|---|
| Inputs and samples | Real device original frames, normal/abnormal samples, exposure and light path conditions, sample grouping and set aside | Not provided, waiting for project input |
| Magnitude and Error | Independent reference value, calibration record, error statistical caliber and mutual confirmation threshold | Not verified |
| Exceptions and boundaries | Anticipated handling of missed detections, false detections, overexposure, occlusion, reflection, out-of-view and communication abnormalities | To be defined |
| System integration | Interface, time synchronization, deployment platform, tempo, log, version and continuous running record | Not integrated |
The source supports measurement principles or similar applications; the module combination, device and acceptance method in this scenario are engineering derivation, and product verification has not been completed.
Transmitting, receiving imaging and distance measurement after calibration
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →The principle of using known projection patterns and geometric deformations for measurement
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Active point triangulation, scanned geometry and error propagation
Verification date: 2026-10-24
View original public information →Return inspection of projection shaft after vibration
Please describe the task object, original picture or video, target indicators, device platform, interface and sample situation.
Phone: 13910119357